Simply stated, the say-so of the US government does not change my belief either way. If they claim to have evidence but don't provide it, I assume they don't h

Simply stated, the say-so of the US government does not change my belief either way. If they claim to have evidence but don't provide it, I assume they don't have evidence, or that the evidence is weaker than they are claiming. If they do provide evidence, I consider the possibility that it has been tampered with, that its provenance is dubious, or that contrary evidence has been concealed. We're talking about professional liars here. Not everything they say is wrong, but everything they say is suspect.