3 ms·
> If government uses its powers to suppress the opposition In what way is the opposition being suppressed? Other than the Congress which is suffering from a se
by sinyug 5y ago
> If government uses its powers to suppress the opposition
In what way is the opposition being suppressed? Other than the Congress which is suffering from a self-inflicted, mortal wound, the smaller parties are doing quite well in their own states.
> prevent criticism of itself
This statement has no basis in reality. The Hinduphobic left and their friends in media have done nothing but abuse the Modi government for seven straight years with zero consequences.
> people who have already suffered from the oppression
Who is being oppressed? In what way?
> Governments operate under the rule of law and respect for democracy and human rights.
Sure. That explains the benevolent nature of the Chinese/Iranian/Pakistani governments. And also why the US government keeps overthrowing other democratically elected governments, interfering in foreign elections and invading foreign countries to spread democracy while carpet bombing the local population.
Please.
Governments are entities that exercise a monopoly over violence within a certain territory. The nature of the government depends on those in power and those who get them there.
- srean 5y agoJournalists, professors (Kappan, Teltumbde) languishing in jail without trial on trumped up charges, and planted evidence indicates otherwise. A 84 year old Parkinson's patient (Stan Swamy) who couldn't feed himself water arrested on trumped up charges, held without trial, dying in jail indicates otherwise. Rampant doctoring and planting of evidence indicates otherwise. Lack of progress in investigations in killings of critics (Gauri Lankesh) indicates otherwise. Lack of progress in criminal proceedings against perpetrators of violence against JNU students caught on camera indicates otherwise. I could keep going on giving examples till the cows come home.
- sinyug 5y ago> Journalists, professors (Kappan, Teltumbde) languishing in jail without trial on trumped up charges Can you please tell the HN audience whether Teltumbde was able to approach the Supreme Court of India for relief and what the SC told him? Or are you also casting aspersions on the Supreme Court? > A 84 year old Parkinson's patient (Stan Swamy) who couldn't feed himself water arrested on trumped up charges, held without trial, dying in jail indicates otherwise. He died in a hospital.[1] He was able to present his case before a court multiple times. > I could keep going on giving examples till the cows come home. A lie here, a half-truth there. I am sure you can find an infinite number of similar "examples." [1] https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/other-states/fr-stan-swamy-passes-away/article35143941.ece https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/other-states/fr-stan-...
- srean 5y agoThe Supreme Court has been far from impartial (especially relevant, because one can see from this news story that calling Supreme court judges out for sexual harassments gets surveillance spyware installed on your devices). I am sure you know that Stan Swamy was denied bail although he posed no flight risk, was denied straw to drink water with because he could not hold tumblers without spilling all of the water and that he had been complaining about his health and that he was taken to hospital by the time his health had irreparably deteriorated, thanks to lack of attention to his medical complaints. If your defense is picking on my shorthand to describe dying while in legal custody of a jail where he was being held without trial, under ludicrous trumped up charges, denied of bail, then I don't have much to add.
- srean 5y agoI can certainly add that the same Israeli company has been found planting evidence in the case that Teltumbde is being held in jail without trial for. https://citizenlab.ca/?s=koregaon https://citizenlab.ca/?s=koregaon
- wolverine876 5y ago> Governments are entities that exercise a monopoly over violence within a certain territory. The nature of the government depends on those in power and those who get them there. If you look at advanced democracies worldwide, which operate under the powers delegated to them, the rule of law and fundamentally exist to protect human rights, that's evidently not the case. The question is, why would you want to believe differently? Why not embrace the great news that democracy works and prospers? Yes, it's not perfect yet - we have work to do to create a more perfect union. But certainly work on a grand project isn't accomplished by destroying it and starting over.