I don't think they should share more tech details. I recall an incident long ago where it was back and forth - you don't know, we know, you don't have proof, w

I don't think they should share more tech details. I recall an incident long ago where it was back and forth - you don't know, we know, you don't have proof, we have proof, share proof - it's all bs.. then the frustrated investigators released a trail of this addy, this pic, which was also used for this and that.. what came of it? not a damn thing changed other than teaching the other side what they needed to not do to not get caught in the same way. If we are not going to put a missile into a building to stop office building 123456 - because of their theft, then keep the proof under wraps. a public statement like this does nothing but make it reasonable for us to continue similar theft - meh. no proof needed for that.