3 ms·
Since someone linked both standards elsewhere in the thread, this is the first valid, self-contained example XML document appearing in the XML spec: <?xml
by HotHotLava 5y ago
Since someone linked both standards elsewhere in the thread, this is the first valid, self-contained example XML document appearing in the XML spec:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<!DOCTYPE greeting [
<!ELEMENT greeting (#PCDATA)>
]>
<greeting>Hello, world!</greeting>
The first example of a complete, self-contained yaml document in the yaml spec looks like this:
# Ranking of 1998 home runs
---
- Mark McGwire
- Sammy Sosa
- Ken Griffey
# Team ranking
---
- Chicago Cubs
- St Louis Cardinals
I think that is quite representative of the user experience as a whole: Yes, there are a ton of dark corners in Yaml that only a tiny fraction of people truly understand, but the default user experience feels just like writing a slightly more convenient JSON, whereas XML by default is a garbled mess.
- kaba0 5y agoIt’s easy to specialize to a tiny tiny subset of all the problems XML can solve by.. not solving those at all