4 ms·
I would be happy to believe them if they released more technical details. Otherwise, just sounds like a typical "best-guess" based on geopolitical consideration
by Leary 5y ago
I would be happy to believe them if they released more technical details. Otherwise, just sounds like a typical "best-guess" based on geopolitical considerations.
For example, the NYTimes just published a piece about a "Rogue" section of the Commerce Department that used racial profiling targeting Chinese Americans:
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/07/16/us/politics/commerce-department-senate-report.html https://www.nytimes.com/2021/07/16/us/politics/commerce-depa...
- stevenicr 5y agoI don't think they should share more tech details. I recall an incident long ago where it was back and forth - you don't know, we know, you don't have proof, we have proof, share proof - it's all bs.. then the frustrated investigators released a trail of this addy, this pic, which was also used for this and that.. what came of it? not a damn thing changed other than teaching the other side what they needed to not do to not get caught in the same way. If we are not going to put a missile into a building to stop office building 123456 - because of their theft, then keep the proof under wraps. a public statement like this does nothing but make it reasonable for us to continue similar theft - meh. no proof needed for that.