4 ms·
All that would be relevant if I were positing that key > keystone, but it's obviously the opposite so I'm not sure why you're trying to convince me that a keyst
by cookie_monsta 5y ago
All that would be relevant if I were positing that key > keystone, but it's obviously the opposite so I'm not sure why you're trying to convince me that a keystone is important.
I'm not looking for a crack here and the "nitpicking" was a convenient example of how both sides are skewing reality to suit their ends.
Anyway, I notice that the title has now been changed to reflect the original headline so I guess somebody else thought they were different enough words to warrant changing it back again.
- dogorman 5y ago> I guess somebody else thought they were different enough words to warrant changing it back again. Or dang thought to cut this fruitless tangent off at the knees. I am perfectly happy with the new headline, because it means the same thing as the old. If I were dang I'd change it too, for that reason. The new headline is still a damning indictment of US media.
- cookie_monsta 5y ago> The new headline is still a damning indictment of US media. It might be if it actually mentioned the US... or is that bit implied?