Not sure about your points. Contrast it with a static HTML+CSS website: - PDFs require a reader, HTML a browser. I wouldn't argue that there are more PDF reade

Not sure about your points. Contrast it with a static HTML+CSS website: - PDFs require a reader, HTML a browser. I wouldn't argue that there are more PDF readers installed than browsers. - Downloaded static HTML works the same - File size can be included in the HTTP response: in the Content-Length header - Printing is nice, but reflowable text is even nicer, since we target a multitude of rendering targets.