3 ms·
This is precisely why the "fear" or rather stigma around facial-recognition needs to go away. If it weren't there, it'd have been expected and granted that the
by zo1 5y ago
This is precisely why the "fear" or rather stigma around facial-recognition needs to go away. If it weren't there, it'd have been expected and granted that the government's job is to have valid, verified and correct biometric information on the citizen (because they're generally the ultimate/final custodian of people's identity), and the facial-recognition would have to match against that verified data, instead of some random video or fake ID.
So instead we have scattered silos of partial and probably incorrect data in various places. FBI has a bit, Police department in state X has one, State Y's DMV has something wrong because X years ago this person was a victim of identity fraud, etc etc. It's a giant mess and no wonder the police and various entities in this example failed utterly. They're ultimately all victims of a system that has no single source of truth, yet we're tasking them with using "tech" to solve crime. So instead of fixing the source of truth, we blame the tech.
- A4ET8a8uTh0 5y agoThe stigma is there, because if it was in one centralized database, the issue would be much more pronounced. It is a lot easier to destroy a company than a government.