3 ms·
Yes. Those with more resources always have more power. Unless some entity takes those resources away at which point they don't have more resources.
by yreg 5y ago
Yes. Those with more resources always have more power. Unless some entity takes those resources away at which point they don't have more resources.
- MereInterest 5y agoSo, neutrality supports the entities that have more resources. Since it is supporting them, can it really be called "neutral"?
- carnitine 5y agoBut shouldn’t something have been done to ensure a better initial distribution of those assets? To be a Bitcoin maximalist basically means you want a future in which the Winkelvoss twins, Pompliano et al are the richest people of all time. How is that a future worth fighting for?
- 7sidedmarble 5y ago>wants to revolutionize the entire system of centralized currency >can't see any reason why you'd want to challenge the existing distribution of that currency
- enumjorge 5y agoThat’s a pretty different take than the grandparent comment where blockchain is disruption brought to you by anarchists.