4 ms·
Shyouhei 's response https://twitter.com/shyouhei/status/1416924523979448322 https://twitter.com/shyouhei/status/1416924523979448322
by throw288199 5y ago
Shyouhei 's response https://twitter.com/shyouhei/status/1416924523979448322 https://twitter.com/shyouhei/status/1416924523979448322
- FooBarWidget 5y agoMachine translation isn't very accurate. Can any Japanese-speaking person translate this?
- emodendroket 5y agoBest effort: > Wow, a lot of comments. What Fullstaq Ruby is doing is difficult to add into mainline, so my overall impression is I'm thankful someone's going to the trouble of doing it themselves. > It's not quite right to say that on Linux with jemalloc it uses less memory. In reality, it would be more correct to say that using a super-old version of jemalloc that for some reason used less memory leads to reduced memory usage (for unknown reasons). So it can't go into mainline. > That said, I can understand that some people are just happy to see reduced memory usage, so if those people want to keep using the super-old version of jemalloc with reduced memory usage, I have no objection. Go for it, is my feeling.