> "why do you get to use it to incriminate someone?" The thing is that it didn't - he's getting heckled due to warrants for his name, but charges against him h

> "why do you get to use it to incriminate someone?" The thing is that it didn't - he's getting heckled due to warrants for his name, but charges against him have always been dropped when the DA has seen 'oh this isn't him' - not because these DAs are nice people who see the misunderstanding, but because the evidence is not strong enough to prove he committed the crime. That's why the case is for "320 Assault Libel & Slander" against Apple & the security company, not false imprisonment against the police department(s) (who have reasonable cause to detain suspects).