4 ms·
> the contents of Facebook is a corporate business decision, not a reflection on morality. Are you suggesting business decisions are exempt from having moral c
by acituan 5y ago
> the contents of Facebook is a corporate business decision, not a reflection on morality.
Are you suggesting business decisions are exempt from having moral consequences? Are the decision makers somehow less culpable as long as it is "just business"?
- SantalBlush 5y agoOf course business decisions have moral consequences. Does this imply that all business leaders are arbiters of morality, or is it only Zuckerberg--who is just making business decisions like the rest--who is an arbiter of morality? The answer is, he's not. He's just a greedy person with a powerful company. There are no real moral decisions to be found here, hyperbole notwithstanding.
- naasking 5y ago> Does this imply that all business leaders are arbiters of morality, or is it only Zuckerberg--who is just making business decisions like the rest--who is an arbiter of morality? Zuckerberg and other social media CEOs are the only ones using moral language to justify censorship, hence the irony of Zuckerberg as moral arbiter