3 ms·

>Oh don't be so vague, go on and name one! See my reply above. >I've been wondering the same thing... Its not possible (or feasible) to implement the key tel

by noxer 5y ago

>Oh don't be so vague, go on and name one! See my reply above. >I've been wondering the same thing... Its not possible (or feasible) to implement the key telegram features in Matrix or other always-e2ee protocols. >It might be easier to have some sort of plugin that overlays encryption on top of Telegram [...] and everyone needs to use your custom clients. Its against the telegram api ToS. You are not allowed to implement features that require other parties to download your client. You can only add local features that do not affect other user who use the official client.

maqp 5y ago
So Telegram's ToS conveniently forbids end-to-end encryption plugins. :D That's amazing security design!
- noxer 5y ago
  You are such an idiot
tffgg 5y ago
What key features are you talking about?
- noxer 5y ago
  see https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27877472 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27877472
  - tffgg 5y ago
    Well, then your key features are already implemented. So much to that
lucb1e 5y ago
>>Oh don't be so vague, go on and name one! >See my reply above. Yeah I saw that. You wrote: > Not even gonna read it all Have a nice day and keep using whatever you want so I don't see why I should bother trying to answer your question as well.
- noxer 5y ago
  You should not, I dont care which IM app you use or why or why you dont wanna use telegram. And you dont care or understand why people use telegram and what they use it for. I tried to explain it but people like you dont want to know. You just want to argue over e2ee nonsense that no one cares about who uses telegram for public conversations. You could ask HN to make comments e2ee its about that "useful" for what I use telegram for. I want my messages to be read, its that simple.