2 ms·
>We’re at the point of, at the very least, barring NSO Group I haven't followed the US response to the behaviour of NSO Group but if things like you mention ha
by Dah00n 5y ago
>We’re at the point of, at the very least, barring NSO Group
I haven't followed the US response to the behaviour of NSO Group but if things like you mention have already been done I very much doubt it isn't a smokescreen. The US is arguably the biggest user and customer to these kinds of services.
>Financing terrorism is a crime
Yes but if you have the power to define what is and what isn't terrorism (or journalistic suppression) then a law is useless. Fixing this is beyond the reach of a representative democracy and the likes. It needs a full-on direct democracy and enough citizens that are against it or a Dictatorship with a dictator that is against it. Otherwise any law pretending to be against stuff like this are at best a smokescreen or at worst a plot to keep it for those in power but out of reach of anyone else.