Right, the article is just playing up the most inflammatory aspect of gas bans. But IMO, a better way forward would be to raise taxes on residential gas delive

Right, the article is just playing up the most inflammatory aspect of gas bans. But IMO, a better way forward would be to raise taxes on residential gas delivery such that home heating with gas becomes cost prohibitive. The extremely low cost of gas incentivizes profligate, wasteful consumption, sort of like the unmetered delivery of water in places like Sacramento, where the marginal cost of water delivery is very low, and the externalized cost of eventual resource depletion is not accounted for.