5 ms·
It might hard to accept this, but "public health" is now a part of the surveillance justification tool kit too. When it's impossible to argue against measures
by briefcomment 5y ago
It might hard to accept this, but "public health" is now a part of the surveillance justification tool kit too. When it's impossible to argue against measures taken in defense of public health without seeming selfish, why wouldn't it be?
- lvs 5y agoNot where I live. Is your request simply not to be seen as selfish while making a selfish argument?
- emilsedgh 5y agoCan you provid examples of this? De we have examples of public health being leveraged for anything other than public health?
- mandmandam 5y ago... Are you serious? Did you just wake up from a 20 month nap?
- briefcomment 5y agoIt may be better for me to rephrase this part of my post like this: > ""public health" is now likely to be a part of the surveillance justification tool kit too" I don't have any specific examples, but this article gives a good gist of what might be at stake. [1] I think this is a key quote > "The Snowden disclosures came twelve years after the initial implementation of the Patriot Act, and it was only last year that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit ruled that the subsequent dragnet surveillance employed by the NSA may well have been unconstitutional." [1] https://slate.com/technology/2021/07/government-data-collection-covid-transparency.html https://slate.com/technology/2021/07/government-data-collect...
- nyolfen 5y agolast may, i recall public health officials and figures coming forward to say that mass protests were acceptable because racism was a greater public health threat than covid. you can see a similar push for gun control using the same rhetoric taking shape
- jdavis703 5y agoWhat health officers said is that 1st amendment rights supersede health orders. Perhaps you could link to a health officer or health order saying otherwise?
- Mountain_Skies 5y agoWhat did public health officials say about those who protested lockdowns?
- chitowneats 5y agoI don't recall health officers specifically saying this. But it was public policy in NYC to explicitly not trace infections spread through the George Floyd protests: https://www.businessinsider.com/nyc-contact-tracers-not-asking-people-attend-george-floyd-protest-2020-6 https://www.businessinsider.com/nyc-contact-tracers-not-aski...
- yebyen 5y agohttps://www.hsph.harvard.edu/news/hsph-in-the-news/racism-public-health-crisis-bassett/ https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/news/hsph-in-the-news/racism-pu...
- rStar 5y agothose health officials couldn't bring themselves to offend the protesters by pointing out that the protests were cesspools of shedding virus. even though the protests were cesspools of shedding virus.
- NationalPark 5y agoDo you have any references for that? I’ve read a few informal attempts and nobody had compelling evidence that the protests caused increased transmission. Seems unlikely since they were outdoors, which is now known to be relatively safe right?
- rStar 5y ago
- satori99 5y agoSeveral state governments in Australia recently had to enact special legislation to stop law enforcement from using covid tracking data to find witnesses and suspects. All state governments had initially ensured the public that the data was not available to LE, but none of them had actually passed legislation to make it unlawful until journalists discovered that the Police were using the data. https://www.afr.com/policy/health-and-education/call-for-national-qr-regime-to-block-police-access-20210616-p581lp https://www.afr.com/policy/health-and-education/call-for-nat... https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-06-15/safewa-app-sparks-urgent-law-change-after-police-access-data/100201340 https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-06-15/safewa-app-sparks-urg... https://www.innovationaus.com/qld-police-accessed-qr-code-check-in-app-data/ https://www.innovationaus.com/qld-police-accessed-qr-code-ch...
- atoav 5y agoIn Germany every piece of data you collect has to specifiy as narrow as possible what it is being collected for before you collect it. Using pandemic related data for policing is a data privacy violation. Of course that didn't stop police from still going into some places and demanding the data. But doing so was a clear breach of law. Every piece of personal data you collect creates a pull factor for various actors to abuse said data, which is why you shouldn't collect more than you need, you should delete (or anon/pseudonymize) it once it is not needed anymore or you should collect it in such a way ot wouldn't be useful for state actors. I am amazed how the German Corona-Warn-App was designed with these principles in mind. They managed to allow people to register into locations while only storing the data locally on your phone. Your phone then downloads the data from the servers in an non-revealing way and queries it for warnings/positive cases that have been issued in these locations at that time. If yes, you get a warning and you can decide how to proceed with this without having any other actor knowing of this. This software is a piece of art from a privacy standpoint.
- johannes1234321 5y agoAt the same time the state-level regulatiins require recording name and contact data, thus making CWA not enough of a (legally accepted) solution, leaving paper lists or trainwrecks like Luca.
- spacehunt 5y agoSingapore COVID-19 contact-tracing data accessible to police https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-singapore-contact-idUSKBN2990X8 https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-singap...
- rixed 5y agoIt's been suspected that enforcing the lockdown was a way to get rid of protests, for instance in Algeria.