2 ms·
>Instead of embracing retrofuturism, solarpunk looks completely to the future This to me is an interesting point I'm skeptical about. In recent times, among so
by Barrin92 5y ago
>Instead of embracing retrofuturism, solarpunk looks completely to the future
This to me is an interesting point I'm skeptical about. In recent times, among some people like Nicholas Taleb and a few others there has been an appreciation for the culture of the Levant or Mediterranean that's about the commercial or city-state and pluralistic attitude of that historical region, some people even trying to start charter city movements, and so on.
It feels like Solarpunk draws heavily from that aesthetic, with its pluralism, mixture of science, diversity and faith and maritime and mercantile culture with some more focus on ecology and technology on top.
That to me very much is a form of retro-futurism, albeit drawing from a cultural background most people will be slightly less familiar with. The place of humans in Solarpunk seems very traditional, in harmony with nature, in human-scale cities, often including artisanal designs with a tech twist, but it very much does not seem future-facing. Even the punk label I think is questionable because very little about it seems transgressive or disruptive.
Solarpunk to me very much has the same sort of parochial, escapist feel of pastoral American utopianism, fleeing back to nature, except that it comes without the Christian or colonial undertones and is explicitly diverse.
- Proven 5y agoHow on earth does it draw on pluralism when it prescribes socialism and the use of solar energy? In anarchocapitalism you're free to own and run your solar powered city. And it can be socialist, too. That's pluralism. In this version only post-capitalistic, solar-powered cities would be permitted. And we'd have to have One Solar Government's employees have free access to everyone's property so that counter revolutionary elements that sustain themselves with fossil fuels can be rooted out. As Lord Acton said: > Socialism ... requires the strongest execution of power – power sufficient to interfere with property.