4 ms·
You’ve posted some variation of “we need to decarbonize our economy” something like four times in this thread, which is a great example of how slogans are thoug
by wk_end 5y ago
You’ve posted some variation of “we need to decarbonize our economy” something like four times in this thread, which is a great example of how slogans are thought terminators. This seems an awful lot like cutting out your daily coffee when you’re millions in debt. I don’t cook with gas and have no particular attachment to it, but at least at a glance this looks performative - and you’re swallowing it hook, line, and sinker. The amount of carbon produced by cooking with gas is surely negligible in the grand scheme of things. What are the carbon costs in decommissioning and replacing thousands of working appliances? Could the money spent on this more effectively decarbonize other aspects of our economy? Could the political capital spent on this more effectively decarbonize other aspects of our economy?
- 0xB31B1B 5y agoThe subject of the article has nothing to do with decomissioning working appliances, it is about not allowing new gas links or gas stoves, entirely different subject here. Every new gas stove we add today has a working life of 15-30 years. Measured over the course of a products lifetime, yes, disallowing gas heating, stoves, water heaters etc in new construction makes a large difference.