5 ms·
Hey, sorry for the misleading title. I started with ‘Fast SQLite Inserts’ and it had many iterations. In the title, I wanted to intend that I want to insert 1 b
by avinassh 5y ago
Hey, sorry for the misleading title. I started with ‘Fast SQLite Inserts’ and it had many iterations. In the title, I wanted to intend that I want to insert 1 billion rows under a minute on my machine. I thought the current title is fine, since I got LGTM for earlier drafts. The detail about on my machine is also important since mine is a two year old laptop and all the measurements are done on it.
Also I got another feedback that title should indicate that it is a test database and emphasise that it is not durable.
I am wondering the right way to convey all of this in the title yet also keep it short.
- scns 5y agoI hate hyperbole but i think the title is fine.
- minitoar 5y agoThanks for the explanation. I think it only needs a minor tweak. Maybe prefix with “trying to” or something like that. I am empathetic to the challenge of naming things concisely and accurately.
- avinassh 5y agoHey, I read all the suggestions and prefixed the title with "Towards ...". I hope it makes it clear now
- newman314 5y agoAttempting 1 Billion Row Inserts in under 1 Minute
- dstroot 5y agoAchieving 100m SQLite inserts in under a minute.
- stevage 5y ago>I am wondering the right way to convey all of this in the title yet also keep it short. Add "trying": "Trying to insert 1 billion rows in SQL in under a minute". If anything it's more interesting because it implies the chance of failure.