3 ms·

"We don't understand how to prevent obesity." Please reference below: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25196414/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25196414/ htt

by BJBBB 5y ago

"We don't understand how to prevent obesity." Please reference below: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25196414/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25196414/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3606061/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3606061/ https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/obesity-prevention-source/obesity-prevention/ https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/obesity-prevention-source/obesi... https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/conditions-and-diseases/obesity/preventing-obesity https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/conditions-and-diseas... https://effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/products/obesity-research-methods/research-protocol https://effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/products/obesity-resear...

JumpCrisscross 5y ago
Read your first link. Literally, from the abstract: “The evidence base is limited in quantity and quality and insufficient to provide clear guidance“ [1]. The entire paper is about the “major evidence gaps.” [1] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25196414/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25196414/
- BJBBB 5y ago
  Which is why I included it first and did not bury it and did not ignore it on my search. But I will give you brownie and taco points for actually reading the references I have read many scientific, peer-reviewed papers on this subject. There is too much 'insufficient' data and too much correlation/causation issues. I am a hardware engineer, so am driven, delimited, and succeed or fail on the veracity of my data. I can generally depend on good data provided by suppliers and its efficacy because it is based on Physics. I have read may MS and PhD papers in botany and cellular biology, and a few CDC/NIH/FDA papers on the OT. I will conjecture that there are too many life scientists on these research teams and not enough physical scientists and engineers.

3 ms·

"We don't understand how to prevent obesity." Please reference below: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25196414/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25196414/ htt

by BJBBB 5y ago

JumpCrisscross 5y ago
Read your first link. Literally, from the abstract: “The evidence base is limited in quantity and quality and insufficient to provide clear guidance“ [1]. The entire paper is about the “major evidence gaps.” [1] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25196414/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25196414/
- BJBBB 5y ago
  Which is why I included it first and did not bury it and did not ignore it on my search. But I will give you brownie and taco points for actually reading the references I have read many scientific, peer-reviewed papers on this subject. There is too much 'insufficient' data and too much correlation/causation issues. I am a hardware engineer, so am driven, delimited, and succeed or fail on the veracity of my data. I can generally depend on good data provided by suppliers and its efficacy because it is based on Physics. I have read may MS and PhD papers in botany and cellular biology, and a few CDC/NIH/FDA papers on the OT. I will conjecture that there are too many life scientists on these research teams and not enough physical scientists and engineers.