> Article is poorly written, but it sounds like this only affects people who didn’t pay for FSD, and now want it. So the title is exactly wrong. The title is c

> Article is poorly written, but it sounds like this only affects people who didn’t pay for FSD, and now want it. So the title is exactly wrong. The title is correct in that these owners paid for hardware they were told was sufficient for FSD. Now they are being told that isn't the case and they have to pay more for /more hardware/. No one is disputing having to pay for the software upgrade, but requiring a hardware upgrade makes it pretty clear the previous hardware was not as capable as it was advertised to be.