4 ms·

Do you have any plans to support ruby-install and therefore chruby?

• FooBarWidget 5y ago
  No. Only rbenv. Unless there's a lot of user request.
  • jbverschoor 5y ago
    I recently switched to asdf. Big time rbenv user, then added nodenv. I also needed multiple yarn versions. As asdf is based off / inspired by rbenv, it was an easy change.
    • busterarm 5y ago
      I'm using asdf for everything I can. Even using it in CI/CD. Wonderful tool.
  • FooBarWidget 5y ago
    Update: if you want asdf support, vote for it here: https://github.com/fullstaq-labs/fullstaq-ruby-server-edition/discussions/76 https://github.com/fullstaq-labs/fullstaq-ruby-server-editio...
• jrochkind1 5y ago
  It's possible you can already easily use with chruby by just pointing chruby at it? I haven't tried, I am interested if anyone wants to report back! https://github.com/postmodern/chruby#rubies-1 https://github.com/postmodern/chruby#rubies-1 (You don't need to use ruby-install with chruby, you can use whatever method of installing rubies you want. The chruby README even includes instructions for `ruby-build`. But normally whatever method you use, you install to `/opt/rubies` or `~/.rubies` which is where chruby will look. But fullstaq ruby insists on installing to it's own locations. But possibly chruby will be fine with that if you just tell it where that is... but you might need to do it for each ruby you install, which woudl be annoying. You could probably write a little bash shim which just checked the fullstaq install location for which rubies it had, and then just added them each individually?)