This is all pretty new in the world. It took many years for aircraft investigations to get real professional at it. How about we start with a simple algorithm

This is all pretty new in the world. It took many years for aircraft investigations to get real professional at it. How about we start with a simple algorithm like this: 1. Check if software is involved in the incident. 2. If it is, carry out an internal review to evaluate the possibility that the software may be a cause of the incident. 3. If it is, hand over to an independent review board. 4. Involve lawyers if and only if, the independent review board recommends it. That was an off-the-cuff attempt at a suggestion. There is probably a much better way. Feel free to suggest alternatives. I have no objection to lawyers getting involved. I just object to them suppressing the facts to protect their clients and preventing an independent investigation. It's impossible to cover up that an aircraft has crashed. Lawyers involved in an aircraft accident on behalf of the manufacturer (or operator) are basically doing 'damage limitation'. Lawyers involved in a software incident on behalf of the manufacturer (or operator) are basically doing 'evidence suppression'. They should stick to 'damage limitation'.