3 ms·
When I read fully open source, bells ring in my mind. I adopted Cypress. It advertised open source and community ethos. But when delved deep, it many basic f
by sidcool 5y ago
When I read fully open source, bells ring in my mind. I adopted Cypress. It advertised open source and community ethos. But when delved deep, it many basic features that were paid. They never advertised it well in documentation. Once bitten, twice shy
- stepbeek 5y agoWhat features are you missing? I’ve never paid for cypress purely because it had what I wanted out of the box. Now I’m wondering if I’ve missed something.
- sidcool 5y agoMainly parallel tests run. They have very limited support for parallel tests in community version. We need to buy the Cypress dashboard license
- stepbeek 5y agoThat’s fair. We built our own little parallel test runner to handle that runs each file in a different process but I would have paid if the official version supported parallel test runs on a single host.
- FooBarWidget 5y agoAuthor of Fullstaq Ruby here. There are absolutely no paid features, nor plans to monetize. There are even enough reasons to not monetize. See the FAQ: https://github.com/fullstaq-labs/fullstaq-ruby-server-edition/blob/main/README.md#will-fullstaq-ruby-become-paid-in-the-future https://github.com/fullstaq-labs/fullstaq-ruby-server-editio... And the project vision, which is community-based: https://www.joyfulbikeshedding.com/blog/2020-05-15-why-fullstaq-ruby.html https://www.joyfulbikeshedding.com/blog/2020-05-15-why-fulls...