3 ms·
I'd be happy to include an edw519-style bulleted list of why webputty is 'a bad thing', but I guess it depends upon who their target audience is for this produc
by dolinsky 15y ago
I'd be happy to include an edw519-style bulleted list of why webputty is 'a bad thing', but I guess it depends upon who their target audience is for this product. If they're targeting someone who is used to ssh'ing into their account on their shared hosting company and editing their css 'live', then yes, I think this product provides a benefit to that user.
Any site I've ever worked on I've always had atleast 2 environments, a local environment and a live environment. Any company I've ever been a part of has had at least 3 environments (sandbox/qa/live) and it's very common to have a dev and staging environment on top of those as well. The reason you have a minimum of 2 environments is so that you can do all of your testing without breaking the live environment, which is what this tool seems to ignore.
- dsmithn 15y ago"Of course, we also let you play with a preview version of your website’s CSS without inflicting any half-baked designs upon your website’s visitors. That’s the version you edit in the WebPutty editor." "You can always export a pretty-printed version of your website’s CSS at any time (both the preview and published versions)." See my other post, I believe you have not understood their product very well.