3 ms·

Cool project. Not a big fan of the name. Kind of hard to sell to a sourcing team. If they called it “Enterprise Ruby” or something like that the conversation is

Cool project. Not a big fan of the name. Kind of hard to sell to a sourcing team. If they called it “Enterprise Ruby” or something like that the conversation is going to be much easier.

sudhirj 5y ago
Phusion Passenger (same team) has lots of enterprise offerings with very entierprisey names and prices.
- bdcravens 5y ago
  Is it the same team? Obviously it's the same lead developer, but I"m unclear the distinction between Phusion and Fullstaq
  - sudhirj 5y ago
    I’m not entirely sure, but I always thought of Phusion Passenger as being a very small team, like Hashicorp.
pmontra 5y ago
Name taken, see http://www.rubyenterpriseedition.com/ http://www.rubyenterpriseedition.com/
- jmcgough 5y ago
  amazing, this hasn't been updated since ruby 1.8
  - FooBarWidget 5y ago
    Author of both projects here. Yes Ruby Enterprise Edition eventually became obsolete because most features found their way back to MRI. But that took a few years. During those years, Ruby Enterprise Edition made a lot of users happy.
    - atonse 5y ago
      We used REE for a while and it was excellent. Thank you for your work on it!
    - samgranieri 5y ago
      can confirm.
- bdcravens 5y ago
  Actually from the same developer. This project is actually under a different company; it's not clear why.
  - jbverschoor 5y ago
    If there are three solutions, you will have to choose which one. I think it's an easier sell to the enterprise, eventhough all three projects are by the same person (passenger, ree, fullstaq)
bdcravens 5y ago
Fullstaq is a company. https://fullstaq.com/ https://fullstaq.com/