5 ms·
I don’t think many people argue it is unfair for YouTube to show ads. They argue it is wrong for them to be tracked aggressively across the web. So where is th
by spiderice 5y ago
I don’t think many people argue it is unfair for YouTube to show ads. They argue it is wrong for them to be tracked aggressively across the web.
So where is the front end I can use to still give YouTube ad views without being tracked? I’m saying this as a YT premium subscriber.
- judge2020 5y agoThat's just an issue with it being associate with Google, though - recommendations are based on your viewing habits and that's done server-side. Most people use recommendations at least somewhat, and don't find absolutely all of the videos via just the subscription and search features.
- lancesells 5y agoThink of how different everything would be if YouTube wasn't a part of Google. They would no doubt have ads but the entire Google universe wouldn't have access to the viewing habits of 2 billion people.
- Pako 5y agoIt also probably wouldn't exist anymore. last time I heard anything about it YouTube was in the red and only sustained with income from other Google services. (I might be wrong on that, if so please correct me)
- ExtraE 5y agoHaven’t checked if this is a reputable source, but: https://www.tubics.com/blog/youtube-revenue/ https://www.tubics.com/blog/youtube-revenue/
- IX-103 5y agoI heard that Google was able to get it to break even after a substantial investment to improve efficiency (custom ASICs for transcoding, machine learning models for prioritizing allocation of storage and computing resources). I think I agree that it probably wouldn't exist. Not very many companies would invest that much to just to break even.
- Rd6n6 5y agoI forget the source, but years ago I tried to look it up and it seemed that YouTube was extremely profitable
- blondin 5y ago> They argue it is wrong for them to be tracked aggressively across the web. sums it up. a long time believer of seeing ads here. that way, i don't have to subscribe to bazillion of platforms i tend to visit. but this view started to shift when i started seeing ads from my alma mater's football team everywhere. the "why am i seeing this ad" link told me that "i gave my information to the advertiser". of course i did, i went to school there!
- mgraczyk 5y agoThe frontend that does this is youtube.com You can completely, 100% opt out of personalized ads. Go to https://adssettings.google.com/ https://adssettings.google.com/ (edit to fix url)
- ffffwe3rq352y3 5y agoI don't want to make a google account so they still track me ;(
- mgraczyk 5y agoYou can still opt out even without an account. The opt-out will be remembered until you clear your browser history. https://adssettings.google.com/ https://adssettings.google.com/
- pabs3 5y agoDid you mean cookies instead of history?
- mgraczyk 5y agoyes
- ffffwe3rq352y3 5y agoHey thanks! I've seen that link thrown around a million times but I've just dismissed it. I appreciate you actually finding a useful one for me!
- autoexec 5y agoAh, the old "Let me track you using this cookie so that you don't have to sign in and let us track you" trick! I'm guessing between IPs, browser fingerprinting, and usage/viewing habits it's beyond trivial for google to know the computer opting out at 3:00pm today is the same one that opted out this morning before clearing their cookies, and the same one that opted out yesterday for 16 hours and the same one the day before that, etc As for me, I'll stick to youtube-dl
- numpad0 5y agoIs the tracking part not a cover argument? For me I went full adblock because forms of ads became obnoxious and contents unpleasant. I wouldn’t mind being manipulated into buying a clunky life improvement gadget that I use exactly once as much as being forced to watch a guy screaming at me for 15 seconds. On second thought, isn’t the latter straight up jumpscare?