3 ms·
You need physical actors because you need someone relatable for the audience. Despite experiments like Tamagoshi, showing that computers can provide occupation
by laurent92 5y ago
You need physical actors because you need someone relatable for the audience. Despite experiments like Tamagoshi, showing that computers can provide occupation of mind, I believe love can still only be provided by humans, no matter how faulty they are.
- coolspot 5y agoPixar doesn’t show physical actors.
- pixel_fcker 5y agoWhether they show their faces or not is by the by. The parts are played by actors (and animators).
- nextaccountic 5y agoDo you know the animator or animators of, say, Frozen? Would you even notice if they switched that to another animator? Compare this to an actor. People often decide to view or not view a movie based on the actors on it.
- sangnoir 5y agoSofia and Hatsune Miku have shown that you can have a relatable, non-human persona. Combined with the K-pop model/marketing machinery and performance capture by replaceable gig-work session actors/contractors, I can easily see a host of virtual performers who are celebrities in their own right, but with Jet Li's martial art prowess as part of their library, and fully owned by corporations. What's not to like, no ever-increasing salary demands, multiple scenes with the same "actors" can be filmed simultaneously, the celebrity never ages, and the non-celebrity human performers behind the scenes are easily replaceable cogs: there will be huge cost savings.