> Well one other way to frame it would be that 96% of the people who got cancer were not regular drinkers. No, that's just bullshit. 4% of cases being attribut

> Well one other way to frame it would be that 96% of the people who got cancer were not regular drinkers. No, that's just bullshit. 4% of cases being attributed to alcohol does not mean that only 4% of cancer patients are drinkers. You don't even understand how risk attribution works, but are happy to spin your own narrative.