>The counter-terrorism system they've conceived is worth learning about. I have learned about it, from multiple sources. > They basically erred on the side of

>The counter-terrorism system they've conceived is worth learning about. I have learned about it, from multiple sources. > They basically erred on the side of "too much surveillance, but alive" over "bomb them all 'til they're dead." So literally a false dichotomy…? > Given the near complete absence of terror in the region over the last few years, I'd say it worked to some end. Compared to when?