It's very inconsistent. How gender, as a purely ideological construct not grounded in science, can be protected under the "hate speech", while at the same time,

It's very inconsistent. How gender, as a purely ideological construct not grounded in science, can be protected under the "hate speech", while at the same time, under the misleading content, it could be easily classified as "Misleading content related to harmful health practices". In principle, it also boils down to who owns the content. If host - Google, claims moderation rights, it undebatably becomes a publisher and should be treated as such.