> Errors can still be handled even without explicit provisions in the language Sure! but as I said in the last sentence of my post, "error handling is as much

> Errors can still be handled even without explicit provisions in the language Sure! but as I said in the last sentence of my post, "error handling is as much user convention as is compiler support" In particular, almost all C code I have seen is designed to handle errors gracefully -- every stdlib function may fail and user is expected to handle it. On the other hand, much of the oberon code I have seen before is pretty bad with error handling -- the program will just halt on any error. Now, I cannot really tell which way Oberon+ will go because there is so little code written in it, and it seems there isn't even a way to open a file as of now. But I browsed around and found JSON parser in Oberon+ and it handles errors by calling halt()... so it does not look like this version has good error handling (yet?)