4 ms·
Maybe it should be the scientists and journalists exploring that possibility, not random Facebook conspiracy nuts? Once an conspiracy is broven true, then FB ca
by underwater 5y ago
Maybe it should be the scientists and journalists exploring that possibility, not random Facebook conspiracy nuts? Once an conspiracy is broven true, then FB can let it ride.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- chitowneats 5y agoFirst of all it isn't "proven true". It's just not proven false. Which has been the case the entire time. One of the reasons it was assumed false was that the scientific community bought into the original letter from Peter Daszak. It turns out Daszak has conflicts of interest regarding WIV and GoF research that, in theory, could have caused the pandemic. It is incredibly naive to allow people to be the gatekeepers of information that is inconvenient for them.
- jdasdf 5y agoScience isn't a god with priests telling you what it says. It's a process that anyone can and should do.
- matheusmoreira 5y agoScientists? Sure. Journalists? No. Banning discussion but allowing the mass media free reign means people are being fed propaganda.
- 0xy 5y agoThe same scientists who lied about mask effectiveness at the start of the pandemic which may have contributed to thousands of additional cases and deaths? The same journalists who said lab leak theory was "racist" (NYT's chief COVID editor made this claim less than a month ago)? The same organizations who said COVID was not transmisable human-to-human in late January, following orders from the CCP (the WHO made this claim repeatedly, without independently verifying it)?