4 ms·
Isn’t it a consequence of a post rendering creative editing, e.g. blurring of the generated chromaticities colours, rather than the code itself being broken. No
by kelsolaar 5y ago
Isn’t it a consequence of a post rendering creative editing, e.g. blurring of the generated chromaticities colours, rather than the code itself being broken. No display can reproduce the entirety of the chromaticity diagram, thus there will always be some form of “cheating” required to try to picture it. I do agree with you that burring is not great though and does not really serve anything but aesthetics.
- mncharity 5y agoGamut limitations mostly affect the periphery, rather than the center. Three arms of lightness converge on a white point, here near the bottom of the line marked 6000. Incorrectly far below the Planck curve, pulling bogus colors down over the curve. The curve should go from red to white to blue. Very not orange yellow green cyan. Figure 45 just below looks more plausible. Earlier versions of the wikicommons diagram[1] seem less blurred, making it easier to see its error. For extra fun, this[2] illustrates both gamut position, and the recurring brokenness of a white point label indicating where white was expected, and the rendered white point being elsewhere. [1] https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:PlanckianLocus.png https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:PlanckianLocus.png [2] https://www.fourmilab.ch/documents/specrend/figures/ciegamut.jpg https://www.fourmilab.ch/documents/specrend/figures/ciegamut...