3 ms·

I always think I can draw the line in the sand as a very rational and relatively well read person. But then I remember that the best thinkers the world has eve

• jjeaff 5y ago
  That may be true of Plato, Aristotle, etc. But one thing I have learned from history is that there is almost always a contingent of people that do find terrible things like slavery abhorrent and were even outspoken about it. But if you are an elite, and benefit greatly from something, you are probably much less likely to be outspoken against it.
  • obedm 5y ago
    I've never heard of any ancient philosopher being abhorrent about slavery and the like and I've read that there weren't any. Could you point to some readings if you're aware of it? I'd love to know
    • MatteoFrigo 5y ago
      Seneca had a somewhat more humane attitude towards slavery. See e.g. https://figsinwinter.medium.com/seneca-to-lucilius-47-on-slaves-and-human-beings-f13602f62b46 https://figsinwinter.medium.com/seneca-to-lucilius-47-on-sla...
      • hutzlibu 5y ago
        And then from inside your link, there seemed to be even more critical voices: "Then again, the Stoics were famous for challenging common conceptions, and the founder of the school, Zeno of Citium, had declared slavery an evil in his Republic"
        • obedm 5y ago
          He acknowledged their existence but as far as I know, he, not anyone else, said that slaving people was "wrong" or shouldn't be done. It's important to note that Ceneca and the famous stoics (Marcus Aurelius for example) were rich and benefitted greatly from the status quo.
          • hutzlibu 5y ago
            So now I think it is a shame, that I barely ever heard of him, despite having heard from all the others great (but slavery endorsing) greek minds. And sure, slavery was very common everywhere at that time. One more reason maybe to celebrate early free thinkers?
    • jjeaff 5y ago
      Most philosophers likely come from the elite classes in the past. You don't have time to sit around and think and write if you have to worry where your next meal comes from.
• jampekka 5y ago
  Perhaps these are the "best thinkers that the world has ever seen" because they said stuff that was beneficial for (some) powers that be. E.g. Plato-Aristotle-line/myth is directly linked to Alexander the Great. Worth noting that there were very influential thinkers and entire schools of thought that looked beyond their noses. A good example are cynics/Diogenes the Dog, who may well have been more influential than the Platonic line. E.g. (as per anecdotes we have left) Alexander the Great had great respect to Diogenes, who totally ridiculed Alexander's (and Plato's) position. Also stoics (e.g. Marcus Aurelius) are quite direct descendants of cynics and not ashamed of this at all. More I look into classical philosophy, or the "myth" of academia, more it seems that it's mostly a fabrication of perhaps scholastics.
  • obedm 5y ago
    This is a very important point. Maybe there were some great philosophers in their time that argued against it and were ridiculed or didn't reach us through time. I'm curious what you mean by being a fabrication? Their ideas were real and they've shaped history throughout time one way or another
    • jampekka 5y ago
      Fabrication is perhaps too strong a term, but the separation between history and myth has not always been that strong. For example it was common (and accepted) to write stuff in some famous person's name. I don't think it makes the content itself any worse, but it's difficult to know what was really historical. I don't formally study this, but such problems become quite apparent when I try to e.g. find out historical sources for some philosophical statements or anecdotes. Probably not that different from how people attribute all sorts of "smart stuff" to Einstein. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pseudepigrapha https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pseudepigrapha Edit: by "scholastic fabrication" I mean that scholastics spent a lot of time "interpreting" especially Aristotle (and tried to make it compatible with the Bible). I'm guessing a lot of what we think is "greek philosophy" may be from these interpretations. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scholasticism https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scholasticism
• idiotsecant 5y ago
  You're making the mistake of assuming morality from your current time, place, and culture is universal morality. You find slavery morally objectionable because the current cultural understanding is that slavery is morally objectionable. Future obedm might find it equally abhorrent that you, for example, routinely consumed the flesh of sentient animals or openly released carbon into the atmosphere for personal gain, or probably a million other things that will be completely unimaginable in polite society 500 years from now.
  • obedm 5y ago
    Haha you mirrored the argument I've made many times before. The eating meat part I feel is likely to be the thing that will change. But that's an obvious one. What else will be seen as "barbaric" that we don't even think of challenging? Working 8 hours a day? Having kids? Going outside or staying inside? I remember the Greeks were not big on private property and instead took great pride in their public buildings. The polar opposite of our society now
    • throwaway210222 5y ago
      > I remember the Greeks were not big on private property Then you first have to make something other than private property the backbone of average peoples' pension funds. I don't have ideas, you?