4 ms·
That is a very valid point and I'm sorry you are seeing downvotes on your comment (so have an upvote from me). The "My Server, My Rules" point of view is absol
by Pick-A-Hill2019 5y ago
That is a very valid point and I'm sorry you are seeing downvotes on your comment (so have an upvote from me).
The "My Server, My Rules" point of view is absolutely 100% valid ( and also why I commented about asymmetrical ftth).
But, What I am also saying is this -
At what point did the Google that was the 'Do No Evil' version pivot in to a position such as they are currently taking?
When did the ethos of 'Let's do good things for good reasons for the good of humanity' pivot to what is potentially a Section 230 nightmare?
To repeat my question - Who judges (and adjudicates) what is or is not misleading or confusing?
- shadowgovt 5y agoI think Google (and the rest of FAANG) is wrestling with the uncomfortable possibilty that they are pawns in several nation-states' disinfo campaigns and they suspect their previous lack of intervention and professional having-no-opinion on questions of fact made everything worse. It's possible that "Don't be evil" means "exercise control over the things you create." Frankenstein's monster wasn't created evil... It learned cruelty after its creator abdicated responsibility for it and it was exposed nakedly to a cruel world.