My guess is that a lot of this is driven by the climate in the USA, so with that in mind I have some examples that I am curious about, as an outside observer.

My guess is that a lot of this is driven by the climate in the USA, so with that in mind I have some examples that I am curious about, as an outside observer. > It also includes incorrect claims that a political figure or government official has died, been involved in an accident, or is suffering from a sudden serious illness. 1) What is the ruling if I store and share a CNN video of a Don Lemon show in which he and a mental health professional discusses her diagnosis that a political figure, whom she has never met, is mentally ill. 2) Same thing but on Fox News and different political figure 3) Same thing but on Infowars but about Hillary Clinton > Content that is demonstrably false and could significantly undermine participation or trust in civic or democratic processes. and > This includes information about public voting procedures, political candidate eligibility based on age / birthplace, election results, 1) Claims in the media and by political figures that the gubernatorial election in the state of Georgia was fraudulent 2) Claims that a Presidential election was "hacked" by a foreign state 3) Claims that a Presidential election was fraudulent > Manipulated media: Media that has been technically manipulated or doctored in a way that misleads users and may pose a serious risk of egregious harm. Again here, dealing in pure objective truth versus media spin and misleading framing: 1) Out-of-context edits suggesting that political figure called neo-nazis "very fine people" 2) A video, absent context, of a fictional reading of a phone call transcript, during an impeachment 3) A statement by a political figure that the COVID-19 virus may have leaked from a laboratory I will be very surprised if the enforcement does not fall on partisan political lines.