3 ms·
This is the logical conclusion to your statement: that someone making a personally beneficial decision can and should not be considered detrimental to society.
by drstewart 5y ago
This is the logical conclusion to your statement: that someone making a personally beneficial decision can and should not be considered detrimental to society.
Since you obviously _dont_ think that's the case, then it becomes a question of whether this is detrimental to society, not whether it's prima facie justified just because it's in each individual's personal interests.
- A4ET8a8uTh0 5y agoMy statement >>People are making rational and sound financial decision that benefits them personally and that is deemed a problem? Your statement >> This is the logical conclusion to your statement: that someone making a personally beneficial decision can and should not be considered detrimental to society. Based on the above it would appear that you assumed a conclusion that happens to include benefit to society. That I did not state. What I did say, however, is that I find it mildly amusing that in a country where individualistic approach to life if not, dare I say it, selfish as a celebrated norm, the moment the situation happens to benefit the little guy, out of the woodwork come people bemoaning that someone is not making nearly as much as they did before. Forgive me while I do not shed to many tears in the process. But even if I assume your assertion that it logically follows that "that someone making a personally beneficial decision can and should not be considered detrimental to society."( and clearly do not think it does ). The two situations are diametrically different in scope, its societal impact and the way we would attempt to correct it. In other words, the problem is scale.