This article and its chart is sending mixed messages. I wonder if the writer and graph guy are the same person. The poll lists a dozen reasons that 9%-14% tick

This article and its chart is sending mixed messages. I wonder if the writer and graph guy are the same person. The poll lists a dozen reasons that 9%-14% ticked as reasons turning for down job offer. Third is benefits. Conspicuously missing is "salary too low " or "expect/hope for a better offer soon." Surely, those are also normal reasons for turning down job offers. IDK what the true "story" is here, but regardless... this does not necessarily sound bad to me. "Hard to find employees" is much better than "hard to find jobs." They are basically opposites. If there are no jobs, employees are plentiful. If jobs are plentiful, employees are not. Why shouldn't we want a bull market for labour? What's the next concern, "salary increases?"