3 ms·
> It is when the disagreement can be eliminated by reducing a vote's consequences. But that "solution" fails to understand the crux of the disagreement, so it
by tablespoon 5y ago
> It is when the disagreement can be eliminated by reducing a vote's consequences.
But that "solution" fails to understand the crux of the disagreement, so it doesn't solve it at all. It's like trying to solve a disagreement over tax rates by abolishing private property.