I strongly agree with the case against non-competes, and think almost all of them should be unenforceable. That said, is there any reason for this to be underta

I strongly agree with the case against non-competes, and think almost all of them should be unenforceable. That said, is there any reason for this to be undertaken at the national level instead of the state level? Generally, I prefer state level interventions because they are easier to undo/avoid, less removed from the people they are serving, and less catastrophic if they are flawed (essentially, I agree with "laboratories of democracy" conception).