2 ms·
As long as we are not talking WW3, Russia is hands down best place to be, it could easily stay cohesive with a lower standard of living, has been switching to
by nuriman 5y ago
As long as we are not talking WW3,
Russia is hands down best place to be, it could easily stay cohesive with a lower standard of living, has been switching to internal supply chains for a decade now, has swaths of empty land and population not foreign to a concept of living off land, but most importantly it is under populated.
Low population density - check
Good defense - check
Cultural and societal background necessary for a post collapse - check
Carrying capacity of land - check
Energy (oil/atomic) - check
Nukes - check
Base of LOWER(more resilient to supply chain disruptions) tech industry - check
Benefits from climate change - check
- giantg2 5y agoOstensibly it would mean WW3, with the potential of China and India moving north.
- giardini 5y agoBe sure to give a friendly wave when you first see your Chinese neighbors! Might be good to brush up on the language too. In North America, anyplace that isn't a target for The Bomb. Decentralization is our friend: small towns today will be more important in the future, once large cities are done in.
- vassilevsky 5y agoFree hectare of land in the East - check https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_on_the_Far_Eastern_Hectare https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_on_the_Far_Eastern_Hectare