4 ms·
Well, of course we expect the gravity waves to be there, given the other effects of relativity that have been confirmed so far. However, scientists still obser
by Roboprog 15y ago
Well, of course we expect the gravity waves to be there, given the other effects of relativity that have been confirmed so far.
However, scientists still observe, verify, measure. As one other poster mentioned, the equipment to detect gravity waves from afar has not yet been able to do the job (due to opportunity or sensitivity, don't know).
If for some reason they do not find the waves (and the instruments are shown to be good), then there will be some more deep thinking to do: were we really looking at objects different than what we thought? Is there some theory more twisted than relativity that needs to be made to explain the previous results as a special case and also explaining the new results???
- andrewcooke 15y agosure. i have already said the same below. i am not criticising the physicists, or the person who originally posted the article, or denying how interesting it would be if waves were not found, or disparaging the technical difficulties involved. i am just tired of the same hackneyed phrase being used in every article related to general relativity. google has over 12 million hits for the phrase "einstein was right". the national geographic is a quality publication. it should know better.