3 ms·
I don't know how you call this evidence, it's a bunch of un-sourced charts (the "sources" link to random data dumps on government websites and there's no indica
by wonnage 5y ago
I don't know how you call this evidence, it's a bunch of un-sourced charts (the "sources" link to random data dumps on government websites and there's no indication of how the "analyst" constructed charts from them)
- robbedpeter 5y agohttps://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3765018 https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3765018 He's not some internet rando. He's an academic, a PhD out of university EAFIT in Colombia. It looks like he's currently working as a data analyst doing postdoc work at Cambridge? Anyway, if you make the hop to his papers and preprints, they look proper and describe the methodology. The paper is linked above is by all appearances well and thoroughly sourced and annotated, and is the source for some of the charts and data on the layman friendly site. In good faith, what else would you think good measures to determine the legitimacy of the information being presented?
- robbedpeter 5y agohttps://mobile.twitter.com/jjchamie https://mobile.twitter.com/jjchamie There's his Twitter, with lots of links and references and conversations with other doctors and researchers. Even being super skeptical, it doesn't look like he's a sock puppet or a deluded nutjob.
- wonnage 5y agoHis twitter is completely unhinged trying to attribute any change in a covid cases/deaths chart somehow to starting/stopping interest in IVM. No thanks!