4 ms·
History shows us that greedy people end up with their heads on sticks. Even when they have armies to protect them. It doesn’t take a lot to regress to that aga
by hughrr 5y ago
History shows us that greedy people end up with their heads on sticks. Even when they have armies to protect them. It doesn’t take a lot to regress to that again.
- rytis 5y agoI think it's excessively greedy who end up on sticks. Moderately greedy are doing just fine...
- taurath 5y agoOne of the main properties of many of the communist revolutions of the 20th centuries was the mass killing or removal of property of the landed gentry in those countries - sometimes more directly violent than others. Cambodia, China, Vietnam, N Korea, etc. I think recent history has shown that simply killing the Bourgeoisie tends to just eventually create another in the form of whoever had the power to do the other killings, and not always to better ends for the people. That form of communism has been shown to not really work. Democratic socialism though seems to work out pretty well for people.
- biztos 5y agoThere’s still plenty of money sloshing around the coffers of European royalty, even in modern republics. If you’re good at the greed thing I think the head-on-stick risk is pretty small.
- eecc 5y agoProblem is the process that brings those heads on the sticks. It often involves death & destruction of plenty other people and infrastructure.
- fogihujy 5y agoNot to mention the countless rebellions that ended with the rebelling peoples' heads on spears. Farmer rebellions usually fail.
- watwut 5y agoI dont really think history shows that. The "greedy people" can keep power for very long and it takes special circumstances for the overthrow - and overthrow usually means instability with a lot of death, torture and pain for everyone.
- hughrr 5y agoYes it's not pretty