I think intentionally picking a fight with wealthy and powerful people over something that is ultimately trivial to the public but deeply personal to your wealt

I think intentionally picking a fight with wealthy and powerful people over something that is ultimately trivial to the public but deeply personal to your wealthy and powerful target could incur a level of business risk that might not be survivable. Gawker is dead because of Thiel who very well may be a craven jackass exploiting a legal loophole, but Gawker willingly loaded that gun…just to try and temporarily capitalize on a wee bit of ad revenue off a viral story. If you are going to push envelopes and speak truth to the rich and powerful, speak a truth that has some level of impact for societal good. I am not going to weep for your gossip rag’s demise when your biggest news scoops center around outing rich guys and showcasing some old wrestlers schlong.