2 ms·
> But perhaps more importantly, I think that what Intel is buying is what was sorely lacking them : people and a methodology of working with external customers.
by baybal2 5y ago
> But perhaps more importantly, I think that what Intel is buying is what was sorely lacking them : people and a methodology of working with external customers. From all I've heard over the years, Intel's process and design teams are so insular and out of touch with the rest of the industry's practices that they had a terrible time just working with customers.
This is not a problem at all. If they wanted to go this direction it's as simple as dumbing down, cheapening their process a bit, and giving free reign to make decisions on what they will be fabbing to technically competent salespeople.
With Intel's resources they could've even developed such commodity process separately to their own process, and ran them in parallel.
They had almost a whole decade to do that. It's just they simply didn't.
- VortexDream 5y agoSimple? When you have culture issues as Intel does, there's nothing simple about any of this.
- kingosticks 5y ago> It's just they simply didn't. They've wanted to go in this direction for many years and so far failed. We've had meetings with them over the years and both times their offering was uncompetitive. I'm not sure what the sales people are supposed to do if the core technologies fabless customers want are not available. I lot of people don't realise Intel are already in the foundary business. I'm not surprised their customers are not shouting about it - why would you want to tell everyone you are using an arguably failed process.