> I don't think anyone serious or in a position of power was arguing that the statement, "It is possible that COVID-19 was the result of a lab leak" should be b

> I don't think anyone serious or in a position of power was arguing that the statement, "It is possible that COVID-19 was the result of a lab leak" should be banned or restricted. https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/other/facebook-lifts-ban-on-wuhan-lab-leak-theory-after-censoring-earlier-reports/ar-AAKqBIp https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/other/facebook-lifts-ban-on-w... > "The social media giant banned any content that asserted COVID-19 was man-made or manufactured in February but told Politico the decision has now been reversed." There was no distinction made between 'lab leak' and 'intentional leak' when censoring the conversation. To me, it's a great example of why censorship of these things should be nipped in the bud. There's plenty more examples if you ddg "lab leak theory".