3 ms·
I'd imagine that portability along with avoiding the need to add a significant dependency to the kernel's core toolchain (rustc, llvm) are two reasons. Rust's i
by Seirdy 5y ago
I'd imagine that portability along with avoiding the need to add a significant dependency to the kernel's core toolchain (rustc, llvm) are two reasons. Rust's involvement in the kernel is mostly relegated to less-essential modules for a reason.