5 ms·
Quite frankly, Apple is not a company that can be remote. All their stuff can be leaked, the attack vector is too large. I understand the hard line stance here
by runawaybottle 5y ago
Quite frankly, Apple is not a company that can be remote. All their stuff can be leaked, the attack vector is too large.
I understand the hard line stance here.
If you are working on a bumble fuck app, great, work from home. There are websites that are ready to publish any little rumor about a new feature in ‘Find my Mac’ because someone’s wife spied it, and told her friend.
Consider this a good problem.
- dcolkitt 5y agoAnd yet Apple Inc had been more than fine after more than a year of full remote work. Their stock price and profits are at record highs, despite being in the middle of a global recession. Clearly nosy spouses peeking into the home office do not pose an existential risk to the company.
- billyhoffman 5y agoIs it not? It’s operated the last 18 months as a remote company. The number of Apple leaks don’t seem any different than any other year. Yes, if you’re working on next gen hardware I can see how that could be challenging. But what about the 2000 employees they have that do App review? (This number was revealed in their ongoing court case with epic) I would wager the majority of jobs at Apple don’t involve things that require physical isolated access
- runawaybottle 5y agoI’d say that is the case because it was a unique year and half. If you extend out the paradigm over ten years, voila, the graph will show itself. The number of leaks will definitely show itself once you adjust the variable of time. Time and human nature is an age old tale.
- lkschubert8 5y agoSo your argument is that if given time data will show your argument is right? I feel like there needs to be a little more support than that.
- TheParkShark 5y agoNearly every argument in here is the persons own feelings and desires to spend more of their time at home. Who wouldn’t want that?